Homegrown
A five-part test for evaluating what “built in Canada” means in your AP software.
Test the claim with evidence. The scorecard takes an afternoon.
Complete the form to get your copy.
Between 2025 and 2026, “Canadian” stopped being sentiment and became formal procurement machinery: the federal Buy Canadian Policy took effect in December 2025, Ontario’s Buy Ontario directives followed, and two-thirds of small businesses diversifying their supply chains are choosing Canadian alternatives.
But a maple leaf on the pricing page is not evidence. This paper sets out five things a buyer can actually check — where AP data lives and who answers for it, whether Canadian payment rails are native or adapted, whether Canadian tax is a data model or a checkbox, whether Quebec’s obligations are handled, and whether Canada governs the vendor’s roadmap or merely appears on its price list. In a July 2026 review of 15 AP automation vendors conducted for this series, none had published substantive Canadian content at all. That gap is the story.
In this whitepaper
- The procurement turn, on the record: Buy Canadian, Buy Ontario and what changed in twelve months
- Five checkable components: data residency, payment rails, tax as a data model, Quebec, and roadmap governance
- Evidence questions any vendor — including Finofo — should be able to answer in a demo
- When a US tool is genuinely a good fit
- The Canadian Software Scorecard: a 0-to-10 test you can run in an afternoon, and how Finofo scores itself
- 0 of 15AP automation vendors reviewed in July 2026 had published substantive Canadian content
- Dec 2025the federal Buy Canadian Policy took effect, giving scored bid preference to Canadian suppliers
- 2 in 3small businesses diversifying their supply chains are choosing Canadian alternatives
